Slice of History - The Mission That Proved Aerobraking Works
In the summer of 1993, NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory embarked on an audacious, unproven maneuver at Venus: using the planet’s dense upper atmosphere to slow down a spacecraft without burning precious rocket fuel.
“For 70 days, the Magellan spacecraft dipped repeatedly into the outer fringe of the Venusian atmosphere,” reported mission updates following the experiment. “The drag created by the gas gradually altered the orbit from a long, stretched out ellipse into a much tighter circle, proving that atmospheric friction could be harnessed as a navigation tool.”
The concept, known as aerobraking, was a high-stakes gamble. Traditionally, spacecraft relied on heavy propellant and engine burns to slow themselves down and adjust their orbits around target worlds. Every extra pound of fuel meant higher launch costs and less room for scientific instruments. By dipping Magellan’s solar panels directly into thewispy upper layer of Venus's atmosphere, engineers demonstrated that natural atmospheric drag could safely achieve the same orbital adjustments, saving massive amounts of mass and fuel.
After completing its primary radar mapping mission and the successful aerobraking demonstration, Magellan was commanded in October 1994 to take one final, dramatic plunge into Venus. During this intentional descent into the dense atmosphere, engineers gathered vital aerodynamic and atmospheric data until contact was lost, marking the end of a historic mission.
Today, aerobraking is no longer an experiment; it is a fundamental pillar of deep space navigation. Engineers now rely on the technique for almost every major Mars orbiter, including Mars Global Surveyor, 2001 Mars Odyssey, and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, allowing spacecraft to arrive at the Red Planet lighter, carry more advanced science payloads, and achieve optimal mapping orbits. CL#26-2902
The content presented here should be viewed in the context of the time period. Our intent is to present the history of JPL in a factual manner that uses primary resources and historical context. We recognize that some information or images do not reflect the current values, policies, and mission of JPL.

